Where to place hands in prayer, and where to take one's religion from
This archive is free and reader-funded.Donate to keep it online
Question: I am referring you to an article written by a 'salafi' in response to Hasan as-Saqqaf'srefutation of al-albani. The issue discussed is thatof the placing of the hands in prayer. Their argument is very convincing since they quote fro m scholars such as Ayni, the [Hanafi] commentatorof al-Bukhari, which appears to show that hanafisalahis based on weak dalail. What have the scholars said in response to this?
Walaikumassalam,
The early Muslims used to say: "This matter is your deen, so be careful where you take your deenfrom."
Things to think about:
1. Are Salafisreliable transmitters of knowledge, or people of gross innovation
2. Who is "Mubarakfooree," whose work was quoted on that site? He was a major member of the Ahle-Hadis(Wahhabi) movement of India , with a gross anti-Hanafi bias, as his (otherwise often useful) works clearly show.
3. Imam Ahmad transmitted the hadithsof placing one's hands on one's chest in his Musnadand was certainly aware of the hadithstransmitted on this matter. However, his position (and the relied upon position of his school) [see: Kashshafal-Qina` of al-Buhuti, and al-Mughniof Ibn Qudama] is the same as that of Imam Abu Hanifaand his students: the sunna, as Imam Ali (Allah be pleased with him) said, is to place one's hands below the navel. Note that all these giants were absolute mujtahids, something Mubarakfooreeand, even more so, Albani, are nowhere close to being.
4. Much of the article is mis-quotes, mixing and matching scholarly reasonings, and imbalanced argument.
5. The established Sunni position is that all four madhhabsare sound, and their positions valid to follow, because the fact is that they are inevitably based on sound proofs, when one considers the legal methodology of that particular school. One cannot superimpose one school's legal methodology on another.
6. As an aside, Hasan Saqqafis an innovator, whose innovations (especially in matters of aqida and methodology) are far worse than those of the Wahhabis. His most recent work is a negation of (the soundly established) beholding Allah in the Next Life.
The following is taken from Shaykh Abdurrahman ibn Yusuf'sexcellent work in English on the evidences of the Hanafi school, Fiqh al-Imam:
Evidence of the Hanafis
1. Wa’ilibn Hujr tnarrates, “I saw Rasulullah eplacing his right hand upon the left one below his navel, in prayer.” [MusannafIbn AbiShayba, Atharal-Sunan 90]
This is the third version of Wa’ilibn Hujr’snarration which was mentioned at the beginning of the chapter containing the words, ‘below the navel.’ Some Hanafi scholars have stated that this version cannot be used as conclusive evidence for their opinion, because the words ‘below his navel’ are only to be found in some editions of MusannafIbn AbiShayba, and not in them all. This is aside from the fact that, as we mentioned, it has an inconsistent text.
However, it is stated in Fathal-Mulhimthat ‘AllamaQasimi bn Qutlubgahhas judged this version to be of sound transmission. ‘AllamaMuhammad Abu ‘l-Tayyibal-Madaniwrites in his commentary on Sunanal-Tirmidhi that this narration has a strong chain,and Shaykh ‘Abid Sindhi states, “Its narrators are trustworthy.” Also, a number of scholars have verified that the addition, ‘below the navel’ is to be found in many manuscripts of MusannafIbn AbiShayba, even if it is not found in the recently published editions. [See Atharal-sunan 148]
Therefore, despite the problematic nature Wa’ilibn Hujr’snarration, this version of it can not be rendered totally unacceptable, since there are many other more reliable reports that strengthen it.
2. ‘ Ali tstates, “To place one palm over the other beneath the navel,is from the sunna of salat.” [Bayhaqi312*, MusannafIbn AbiShayba 1:391]
It is a known fact that whenever a Companion utters the words ‘It is from the sunna’ regarding any action, it means it is something acquired from Rasulullah ehimself. Hence, ‘ Ali tcould have only reported this practice as sunn a after observing Rasulullah edo it. The problem with this narration is that it contains ‘Abdal-Rahman ibn Ishaqin its chain whohas been classified as weak. The Hanafishave not fully relied on this narration as a basis f or their opinion, but since there are many other narrations which reinforce it, it could still stand as supplementary evidence.
3. Hajjajibn al-Hassan relates, “Either I heard Abu Mijlazsaying or I inquired from him, ‘How should one position his hands [during prayer]?’ He replied, ‘He should place the inner portion of his right hand upon the back of the left one beneath the navel.” [MusannafIbn AbiShayba 1:390]
The transmission of this hadith is sound [hasan],as ‘AllamaMardinistates in his book al-Jawharal-naqiyy.
4. Ibrahim al-Nakh‘ayrelates, “One should place his right hand upon the left one beneath the navel whilst in salat.” [MusannafIbn AbiShayba 1:390]
The transmission of this hadith is also sound [hasan].
5. Abu Hurayra tnarrates, “The placing of one hand over the other in salatshould be beneath the navel.” [al-Jawharal-naqiyy2:31*]
6. Anas treports that there are three aspect s from the character of Nubuwwa[Prophethood]: to open fast early, to delay the suhur[pre-dawn meal], and to position the right hand over the left one beneath the navel while in salat. [al-Jawharal-naqiyy2:31*]
Other reasons f or the Hanafi opinion
The scholars have provided various reasons why the hands are best placed beneath the navel and why this method has been classified as most preferable.
(a) Although most of the ahadithon this issue are weak in one way or another, the narrations presented by the Hanafishave been judged to be more soundthan the rest.
(b) Ibn al-Humamstates in his book Fathal-Qadir, “Due to the inconsistency and contradiction s found between the various narrations, it is best to resort to analogy and reasoning. Standing before the Lord demands a posture which expresses respect and reverence. Since positioning the hands beneath the navel is probably the most respectful way of standing, it will be considered most superior. On the other hand, the reason for women being instructed to position their hands on their chest,is so that greater concealment [and modesty] can be achieved by this.”
3. ‘Allama‘Aynistates, “To position the hands beneath the navel holds great virtue. It is a posture which signifies great respect. It displays greater contrast to the postures of the disbelievers.” He also writes, “This is the same posture in which one stands before the rulers [of this world].” He further states, “Placing the hands on the chest creates a similarity with women, hence that cannot be classified as the sunnafor men.” [‘Umdatal-qari3:16*]
Walaikumassalam,
Faraz Rabbani.
This answer was published by SunniPath and is preserved as written. Rulings can depend on circumstances; for your own situation, consult a qualified scholar.
Comments
No comments yet.